Inside every empty room, there is already a story. The question is how to let the architecture speak without drowning out the subject.
There is a staircase in Cologne that I have photographed seventeen times and still do not fully understand. It curves like a thought left unfinished — concrete, pale, lit from a skylight that shifts its color with every hour of the day. The first time we shot there, we came with a model, a single dress, and no plan. We left with the best frames of the year.
Architecture is not a backdrop. This is perhaps the most important thing I have learned in years of editorial work. A backdrop is passive — it holds color, it absorbs light, it stays where you put it. Architecture argues. It insists. It has proportions and shadows and intentions of its own, built by hands decades or centuries before ours, for purposes that had nothing to do with fashion. That tension — between what a space was made for and what we are now asking of it — is where the image lives.
Choosing the Right Argument
When we scout a location, we are not looking for beauty. Beauty is easy to find and easy to waste. We are looking for character — something the space does that our subject cannot do alone. A brutalist courtyard offers weight, solemnity, the feeling of being small inside an idea. A crumbling hotel corridor offers time, specifically the feeling that time has done something to this place and left a mark. A glass atrium gives you light as architecture itself — not just as illumination but as structure. Each of these spaces has a position. It wants something.
We have shot in industrial buildings where the floor still held the faint outlines of machinery long removed — ghosts of function pressed into concrete. We have shot in grand foyers where the light falls not from windows but from the shape of the ceiling itself, curved to direct it like an instrument. In each case, the choice of space was also the first creative decision of the shoot. Everything that followed — the wardrobe, the movement, the color — was a response to what the walls had already said.
The Model as Response
Once we have found a space that speaks, the directing changes. We no longer ask the model to create a mood from within herself alone. We ask her to respond — to the scale of the room, to the angle of light falling through a distant window, to the texture of a wall that has absorbed decades of seasons. The pose is no longer invented; it is discovered. She leans into a doorframe not because we told her to, but because the doorframe asked.
This is the difference between a portrait and an editorial image. A portrait centers the person. An editorial image builds a world, and the person inhabits it. Architecture is the fastest way I know to build that world without props, without production design, without anything beyond presence and attention. The space becomes the art director you did not know you needed.
Last autumn we shot in an abandoned textile factory outside the city. The windows were enormous — the kind of windows industrial buildings made before they stopped believing in natural light — and the floor was cold, pale, scarred. The model wore ivory. She stood in the center of where a loom had once stood, and the photograph felt like archaeology. We had not planned any of it. The space had simply decided, and we had been wise enough to listen.
I think of architecture as a co-author now, not a setting. When I choose a location, I am choosing a voice to write alongside mine. The best editorial images feel like conversations — between subject and space, between past and present, between the controlled and the found. The walls do not stay quiet. They never have. And the images that know this are the ones that last.
Share this story